Expert Opinions & Industry Commentary

Why Most Businesses Underestimate Tender Strategy (and How to Fix It)

System Administrator December 12, 2025 4 min read 71 views

Why Most Businesses Underestimate Tender Strategy

Too many organizations treat tendering as a back-office chore: a document to fill in, a price to drop, and a deadline to meet. That mindset turns a high-value opportunity into a transactional exercise and hands competitive advantage to firms that treat tenders strategically. This post explains the common blind spots, the real costs of underestimating tender strategy, and a practical plan to change the outcome.

What businesses usually get wrong

  • It is 'just paperwork' – The tender is seen as administrative rather than a sales and positioning moment.
  • Price-first thinking – Many assume the lowest price wins, ignoring value articulation, risk mitigation and compliance.
  • Late involvement – Procurement or bid teams are brought in at the last minute instead of during capture and shaping phases.
  • No capture plan – Firms fail to perform stakeholder mapping, competitor profiling or win-criteria analysis.
  • No lessons learned – Post-bid reviews rarely happen, so mistakes repeat and institutional knowledge is lost.

The real costs of underestimating tender strategy

Underinvestment in tender strategy leads to measurable losses beyond missed contracts:

  • Lower win rates – Poorly targeted responses reduce conversion from tender invitation to contract.
  • Margin erosion – Competing on price alone compresses profitability.
  • Wasted resources – Time and effort on tenders you were unlikely to win in the first place.
  • Reputation risk – Non-compliant bids or inconsistent messaging harms buyer confidence.
  • Opportunity cost – Neglecting strategic capture means losing longer-term, higher-value contracts.

How smarter tender strategy changes outcomes

Strategic tendering treats each opportunity as a mini-campaign that requires market intelligence, positioning, and cross-functional coordination. When done well, it lifts win rates, preserves margin, and reduces wasted effort.

A practical 6-step plan to improve your tender outcomes

  1. Audit current process – Map how tenders are discovered, assessed and executed. Track time, costs and win rate per tender type.
  2. Define target opportunities – Create criteria for which tenders are worth pursuing (deal size, strategic fit, margin thresholds, likelihood to win).
  3. Run a capture plan – For prioritized tenders, do stakeholder mapping, competitor analysis, and value proof points before the RFP closes.
  4. Standardize templates and evidence – Build modular response templates, pre-approved technical content, and a library of compliance documents to save time and increase quality.
  5. Price strategically – Use pricing models that reflect value, risk, and win-probability, not just cost-plus or deepest discounting.
  6. Review and improve – Hold a post-bid review within 2 weeks: what worked, what lost, and what to change next time.

Roles and governance to support strategy

Even small firms benefit from clear ownership:

  • Bid/capture lead – Owns capture plan, coordinates stakeholders and manages deadlines.
  • Subject matter owners – Provide technical input and evidence from delivery teams.
  • Pricing authority – Ensures offers align to financial targets.
  • Executive sponsor – Clears strategic exceptions and supports relationship-building with key buyers.

Short case example

Example: A mid-sized IT services firm was winning only 12% of tenders they responded to and often conceded margin to low bids. After implementing capture planning for prioritized tenders, introducing response templates and appointing a bid lead, their win rate rose to 34% within 12 months, while average margins on won contracts improved by 6 percentage points. The shift came from better qualification of opportunities and clearer articulation of value rather than deeper discounts.

Quick tender readiness checklist

  • Do you have written criteria for which tenders to chase?
  • Is capture planning started before the RFP is finalized?
  • Are templates and pre-approved evidence readily available?
  • Is pricing tied to value and win-probability rather than pure undercutting?
  • Do you perform structured post-bid reviews?

Final thoughts

Tenders are a repeatable sales channel. When treated as a strategic process rather than a form-filling exercise, they become a source of predictable growth and margin. Start small: pick a single tender type, audit your approach, and apply the 6-step plan. Over time those improvements compound into better win rates, healthier margins, and a stronger pipeline.

If you want a one-page checklist or a starter capture plan template, consider downloading a simple kit or scheduling a quick internal tender audit this week to identify the biggest leverage points.

Share this post
Twitter Facebook LinkedIn

Related Posts

How TenderFlow Fits Into Your Tender Workflow

Explore how TenderFlow integrates into every stage of your tender lifecycle — from discovery and a...

TenderFlow vs Traditional Tender Alert Services: Why a Management Platform Wins

Traditional tender alerts notify you of opportunities — TenderFlow turns those alerts into managed...

Supply & Delivery Tenders Explained: Goods and Logistics Made Simple

This practical guide explains how supply and delivery tenders work for goods and logistics. Learn th...

Tender Evaluation Readiness Checklist

A practical checklist to get your team evaluation-ready for tenders. Covers documentation, scoring m...

How to Find and Apply for Tenders in Free State, Limpopo & Mpumalanga

This guide explains how to find and apply for tenders in Free State, Limpopo and Mpumalanga. Learn w...